<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bioshock 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gameguide.co.nz/2010/02/13/bioshock-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gameguide.co.nz/2010/02/13/bioshock-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhett</title>
		<link>http://www.gameguide.co.nz/2010/02/13/bioshock-2/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameguide.co.nz/?p=1230#comment-875</guid>
		<description>The original certainly was much more &quot;low key&quot; than a big action epic like Call of Duty. The way the story was delivered via audio diaries, for example.

I suppose it was the sense of atmosphere more than anything that I liked. The only other game I can compare it to is Fallout 3. Not that they share a lot in common, but for both the major strength was the atmosphere. 

But I hear ya. I definitely didn&#039;t have as much fun moment-by-moment playing Bioshock as I did play say GTA IV or Modern Warfare 2. But the story and feeling of the place stayed with me. It&#039;s like watching a weird arthouse film vs watching Transformers on the big screen. Sure, the blockbuster movie may be more entertaining in the short term, but more often than not it&#039;s the arthouse movie which stays with you.

I felt that way about Bioshock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original certainly was much more &#8220;low key&#8221; than a big action epic like Call of Duty. The way the story was delivered via audio diaries, for example.</p>
<p>I suppose it was the sense of atmosphere more than anything that I liked. The only other game I can compare it to is Fallout 3. Not that they share a lot in common, but for both the major strength was the atmosphere. </p>
<p>But I hear ya. I definitely didn&#8217;t have as much fun moment-by-moment playing Bioshock as I did play say GTA IV or Modern Warfare 2. But the story and feeling of the place stayed with me. It&#8217;s like watching a weird arthouse film vs watching Transformers on the big screen. Sure, the blockbuster movie may be more entertaining in the short term, but more often than not it&#8217;s the arthouse movie which stays with you.</p>
<p>I felt that way about Bioshock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.gameguide.co.nz/2010/02/13/bioshock-2/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameguide.co.nz/?p=1230#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Your closing words &#039;a solid, slightly above-average story-based shooter&#039; describe how I feel about the original Bioshock game. I never played more than a couple of hours of the original because I found it boring, and while the setting was fairly unique, I found still it pretty cheesy. Each to their own I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your closing words &#8216;a solid, slightly above-average story-based shooter&#8217; describe how I feel about the original Bioshock game. I never played more than a couple of hours of the original because I found it boring, and while the setting was fairly unique, I found still it pretty cheesy. Each to their own I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
